By Uriah Kumadoh | Kumadoh Perspective
If more homes are being built, why does owning one still feel out of reach for the people who need them?
That is the uncomfortable question at the centre of this episode of Kumadoh Perspective. The conversation is not simply about expensive apartments or whether developers should charge less. It is about the relationship between property prices, household incomes, construction costs and access to finance.
Ghana’s housing challenge is not only about how many homes we build. It is also about whether the people who need those homes can realistically afford them.
A property can be available for sale and still be completely inaccessible to the household searching for a place to live. Understanding that distinction changes how we think about Ghana real estate, homeownership and property investment.
Watch the full episode
Watch “The Ghana Real Estate Elephant” below, then explore the key issues and their implications for buyers, developers and investors.
A housing shortage is not the same as a market of ready buyers
When people discuss the Ghana housing deficit, it is tempting to assume that almost any new residential development must be meeting an urgent need.
But a shortage of housing does not automatically create customers for every property at every price.
Imagine a working couple searching for their first home. They have regular income and a genuine need for housing. Yet the deposit required is beyond their savings, and the monthly repayments would leave too little for everyday expenses.
Their need is real. Their ability to purchase that particular property is not.
This is the difference between needing a home and being able to pay for one. A development can attract plenty of interest without attracting enough qualified buyers.
For anyone considering Ghana property investment, the important question is therefore not just, “How many people need housing?” It is, “How many of those people can afford the property I plan to provide?”
Who is Ghana real estate being built for?
Luxury apartments, gated communities and premium townhouses are not inherently a problem. Buyers are entitled to seek security, attractive design, convenient locations and high-quality amenities.
The question raised in the episode is whether the wider housing market offers enough realistic alternatives for ordinary working households.
What does the market offer a teacher, nurse, accountant, engineer or young entrepreneur whose income is steady but whose savings are limited?
A property does not have to be in Cantonments, Airport Residential or East Legon to serve that household. However, it needs to offer a workable combination of price, safety, transport and access to essential services.
A housing market should not require every aspiring homeowner to become wealthy before they can participate.
The goal is not to eliminate premium housing. It is to create a broader range of homes for people with different incomes and needs.
Why telling developers to “build cheaper” is not enough
It is easy to look at an expensive listing and conclude that the developer simply wants too much profit. But that explanation does not account for the full cost of delivering a finished home.
A development budget must cover more than blocks and roofing. It can include land acquisition, professional services, approvals, materials, labour, financing, utility connections, drainage and access roads. Delays and unexpected work can add further costs.
When those costs are high, the developer faces a difficult equation: how can the project remain commercially viable at a price that the intended customer can afford?
The episode argues that this tension helps explain the attraction of buyers with greater purchasing power. It also points to a more useful question than simply demanding lower selling prices:
How do we make building quality homes for ordinary income earners commercially viable?
That requires attention to the entire development process. Lower-cost construction alone will not solve a project burdened by expensive land, unsuitable financing or missing infrastructure. Equally, reducing the price by cutting structural quality is not a genuine affordability solution.
Mortgage access is the link between income and ownership
A household may be able to support a reasonable monthly housing payment without being able to buy a finished property outright.
Mortgage finance can connect those two realities by spreading repayment over time. However, the existence of a mortgage product does not automatically make a home affordable.
The deposit, interest rate, repayment term, fees and borrower’s income all affect whether the arrangement works. A longer repayment period can reduce the monthly payment while increasing the total interest paid, depending on the loan terms.
In the episode, the financing concern is straightforward: when buyers cannot access a workable route from regular income to ownership, those who already have substantial capital hold an advantage.
That does not mean every household should take on a mortgage. It means that the discussion about affordable housing in Ghana must include the cost and accessibility of finance—not just the advertised price of the building.
An instalment plan is not affordable merely because payments are spread out. The actual amounts and deadlines still need to fit the buyer’s circumstances.
A cheaper property is not always a more affordable home
Moving farther from central Accra might reduce the purchase price in a particular search. But the household’s financial assessment should not stop there.
Consider two hypothetical homes. The first costs less to buy but requires a longer commute and additional spending to manage unreliable services. The second costs more upfront but is closer to work and has the infrastructure the household needs.
The cheaper listing may not produce the cheaper overall lifestyle.
This is why the episode connects housing affordability with roads, water, electricity, drainage and transport. A home is part of a neighbourhood and a daily routine, not an isolated asset.
When comparing houses for sale in Ghana, consider the combined burden of the purchase, financing, maintenance, service charges and transport. Time matters too: a home that adds hours to the daily commute creates a cost that does not appear in the sales brochure.
Housing affordability is also a generational wealth issue
Consider what happens when property prices rise faster than the savings of households trying to buy.
An existing owner may benefit from a higher property valuation. A first-time buyer faces a larger target. The same price movement can therefore improve one person’s position while making another person’s entry into the market more difficult.
This is a scenario explored in the episode, not a claim that every property will appreciate or that all households have the same experience.
It raises an important question: can someone with a productive working life build a realistic path towards a decent home, or does ownership increasingly depend on existing assets and outside financial support?
A housing discussion focused only on rising property values misses that distinction. Sustainable progress should consider access for new buyers as well as the interests of current owners.
The opportunity may be efficient housing, not another luxury label
The affordability challenge also suggests a business opportunity—but not a guaranteed investment return.
Instead of starting with the highest price a development might achieve, a developer could start with a clearly defined customer: their income, savings, household size, location needs and realistic payment capacity.
The next task is to assess whether a suitable home can be delivered at that price while maintaining quality and financial viability.
The episode explores possibilities such as smaller, well-designed homes, standardised layouts, reduced material waste, efficient land use and better coordination between construction and infrastructure.
The distinction is important. Affordable should not mean unsafe, poorly ventilated, badly built or disconnected from essential services. A thoughtfully planned two-bedroom home may serve its intended household better than a larger property with expensive features they do not need.
The opportunity is to deliver useful quality at a price a clearly identified customer can sustain.
Whether that model works requires proper costing, local market research and realistic financing—not an assumption that a national housing shortage guarantees sales.
Government’s role goes beyond building houses
Public housing projects are one part of the conversation. The episode also asks what government could do to make housing delivery work better across the wider market.
That includes the conditions around development: infrastructure, transport, planning, land administration and financing frameworks.
For example, a well-connected area with reliable services can become a more practical location for homes than an area where residents must solve those problems themselves. However, infrastructure improvements do not automatically guarantee affordable prices; land values, housing supply and financing still matter.
The wider goal should be to connect where people can afford to live with where they work and access services.
Housing policy is therefore not only about the building. It is also about making the surrounding community functional.
What buyers and investors should take from this conversation
For a homebuyer, affordability is personal. A property that fits another person’s budget, family support or income currency may not fit yours. Compare the complete financial commitment with your own circumstances rather than treating the asking price as the whole decision.
For an investor, housing need is a starting point for research—not proof of demand at your proposed selling price or rent. Identify who the customer is and what they can realistically pay.
For a developer, the challenge is to bring customer needs, project costs and financing into the same calculation before committing to a particular product.
These are different perspectives on the same question: do the numbers work for the people expected to use the home?
The real Ghana real estate elephant
The most useful housing question is not simply, “Why are properties expensive?”
It is, “How do we connect the cost of delivering a decent home with what a working household can realistically afford?”
There is no single answer. Land, construction, income, finance, location and infrastructure all influence the outcome. Blaming only developers—or telling buyers to work harder—does not resolve that relationship.
The ambition should be a housing market with room for premium buyers and a credible path for ordinary households seeking a safe, functional home.
Ghana does not only need more buildings. It needs housing that works for the people expected to live in it.
What do you think is the biggest obstacle: construction costs, land prices, household incomes, financing or infrastructure? Share your view in the comments and watch the full episode above.
Subscribe to Kumadoh Perspective for more conversations about real estate, business and investment in Ghana and across Africa.
Frequently asked questions about housing affordability in Ghana
Why can a housing shortage exist alongside unaffordable homes?
Because the homes available may not match the budgets, locations or financing options of the people who need housing. Increasing supply in one price segment does not automatically meet needs in another.
Does affordable housing mean poor-quality construction?
No. Affordability can be pursued through efficient design, appropriate unit sizes, reduced waste and better infrastructure coordination. Safety and essential building quality should not be the trade-off.
Is buying farther outside Accra always the better option?
No. Compare the purchase price with transport, maintenance, services and the effect on daily life. The best fit depends on the household and the specific property, not distance alone.
Can mortgages solve Ghana’s housing affordability problem?
They can help connect regular income to homeownership, but they are not a complete solution. The deposit, borrowing cost, repayment terms and property price must still be manageable for the borrower.
Does strong housing need guarantee a profitable property investment?
No. A project needs customers who can afford its actual price or rent. Costs, financing, location, competition and the time required to secure buyers or tenants also affect the outcome.
About this article: Adapted from the original “The Ghana Real Estate Elephant” episode script and its accompanying